Arxo research example · fictional households · recorded answers
Housing aid: when a division needs a rounding choice
What happens when the quoted rule divides by twelve but the supplied case has no finite decimal result?
The original French passage divides the total by twelve without adding a rounding instruction. The retained fictional case first receives no amount, then is replayed with an explicit cent-rounding reading.
The selected reading follows CNAF practice; it does not change the article. A bounded random search examined one world and reported no additional findings. The rounding example is a separate replay of a known case, not a discovery from that search.
Recorded example
D. 832-26 · no silent rounding
The quoted passage divides the total by twelve without stating a rounding instruction. In this fictional resident case, that division has no finite decimal result. The engine therefore returns no amount until a rounding reading is explicitly selected. The selected reading follows CNAF practice; it is not wording added to the article.
| Month of law | 2026-03-10 |
|---|---|
| Without rounding choice | No amount returned |
| With explicit cent rounding · half up | 164.76 EUR |
| Program and family facts | Identical in both recordings |
The scope of the search
The native random search examined one generated world within its saved limits. It reported no additional findings; this does not establish that the package contains no gaps. The quoted rounding example is a separate replay of an existing recorded case, not a discovery attributed to that random run.
| Random worlds examined | 1 |
|---|---|
| Additional findings | 0 |
| Rounding example | Separate recorded refusal and replay |
French primary sources
Le résultat est majoré du produit d'un montant forfaitaire par le nombre de parts “ N ”, le total étant ensuite divisé par douze.